Accreditation types: 0.75 ABIM MOC, ABS MOC, CME

Expires: October 2027

To play this presentation please log in.


Don't have an account?

Sign up for free and get access to 400+ programs, live events, CME/CNE evaluations, bookmarks, watch history, and more.

Faculty

Neeraj Agarwal

Faculty

Neeraj Agarwal

MD, FASCO

The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

Medical Oncologist, Co-Director, Prostate Cancer Program, Harvard Cancer Consortium

TARGET AUDIENCE
These activities are intended for medical oncologists, hematology-oncology fellows and other healthcare providers involved in the treatment of prostate cancer.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  • Appreciate the incidence and clinical relevance of PTEN deficiency in prostate cancer, and discern the optimal method to assess PTEN status in patients.
  • Appreciate the biological rationale for dual inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and androgen receptor (AR) pathways in patients with PTEN-deficient prostate cancer.
  • Evaluate available Phase III data with combined AKT inhibition, AR pathway inhibition and androgen deprivation therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with PTEN deficiency, and consider the role of this form of treatment.
  • Implement a plan of care to recognize and manage side effects and toxicities associated with AKT inhibitors in preparation for their potential availability for patients with prostate cancer.

ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Interview: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Lecture: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (ABIM) — MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION (MOC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the participant to earn up to 1 (interview) or 0.75 (lecture) Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for each activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

Please note, this program has been specifically designed for the following ABIM specialty: medical oncology.

AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY (ABS) — CONTINUOUS CERTIFICATION (CC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the learner to earn credit toward the CME and Self-Assessment requirement(s) of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABS credit.

Please note, this program has been specifically designed for the following ABS practice area: complex general surgical oncology.

PRIVACY POLICY
Personal information and data sharing: Research To Practice aggregates deidentified user data for program-use analysis, program development, activity planning and site improvement. We may provide aggregate and deidentified data to third parties, including commercial supporters. We do not share or sell personally identifiable information to any unaffiliated third parties or commercial supporters. Please see our privacy policy at ResearchToPractice.com/Privacy-Policy for more information.

HOW TO USE THESE CME ACTIVITIES
To receive credit for these activities, the participant should review the CME information, watch the video, complete the post-test with a score of 80% or better and fill out the evaluation (interview, lecture).

CONTENT VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice (RTP) is committed to providing its participants with high-quality, unbiased and state-of-the-art education and adheres to the ACCME’s Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. Any individuals in a position to control the content of an accredited continuing education activity, including faculty, planners, reviewers and others, are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities (commercial interests). All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated prior to the commencement of these activities. In addition, all activity content is reviewed by RTP scientific staff and an external, independent physician reviewer for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies referenced and patient care recommendations.

FACULTY — Dr Agarwal has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

EDITOR — Dr Love is president and CEO of Research To Practice. Research To Practice receives funds in the form of educational grants to develop CME activities from the following companies: Aadi Bioscience, AbbVie Inc, ADC Therapeutics, Agendia Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc, Array BioPharma Inc, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc, Arvinas, Astellas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, BeOne, Biotheranostics Inc, A Hologic Company, Black Diamond Therapeutics Inc, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals Inc, Celcuity, Clovis Oncology, Coherus BioSciences, Corcept Therapeutics Inc, CTI BioPharma, a Sobi Company, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Eisai Inc, Elevation Oncology Inc, Exact Sciences Corporation, Exelixis Inc, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Genmab US Inc, Geron Corporation, Gilead Sciences Inc, GSK, Helsinn Therapeutics (US) Inc, ImmunoGen Inc, Incyte Corporation, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, A Gilead Company, Kura Oncology, Legend Biotech, Lilly, MEI Pharma Inc, Merck, Mersana Therapeutics Inc, Mirati Therapeutics Inc, Mural Oncology Inc, Natera Inc, Novartis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation on behalf of Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novocure Inc, Nuvalent, Nuvation Bio Inc, Pfizer Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Puma Biotechnology Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Revolution Medicines Inc, Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc, R-Pharm US, Sanofi, Seagen Inc, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, SpringWorks Therapeutics Inc, Stemline Therapeutics Inc, Sumitomo Pharma America, Summit Therapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, TerSera Therapeutics LLC, Tesaro, A GSK Company, and Verastem Inc.

RESEARCH TO PRACTICE CME PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, STAFF AND REVIEWERS — Planners, scientific staff and independent reviewers for Research To Practice have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

These educational activities contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the Food and Drug Administration. Research To Practice does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. The opinions expressed are those of the presenters and are not to be construed as those of the publisher or grantor.

These activities are supported by an educational grant from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.

Release date: October 2026
Expiration date: October 2027

Carver BS et al. Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 2011;19(5):575-86. Abstract

Chung JH et al. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling of primary and metastatic prostate tumors. JCO Precis Oncol 2019;3:PO.18.00283. Abstract

de Bono JS et al. IPATential150: Phase III study of ipatasertib (ipat) plus abiraterone (abi) vs placebo (pbo) plus abi in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). ESMO 2020;Abstract LBA4.

Degan SE, Gelman IH. Emerging roles for AKT isoform preference in cancer progression pathways. Mol Cancer Res 2021;19(8):1251-7. Abstract

Fizazi K et al. Capivasertib plus abiraterone in PTEN-deficient metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: CAPItello-281 phase III study. Ann Oncol 2026;37(1):53-68. Abstract

Fizazi K et al. A phase III study of capivasertib (capi) + abiraterone (abi) vs placebo (pbo) + abi in patients (pts) with PTEN deficient de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): CAPItello-281. ESMO 2025;Abstract 2383O.

Garcia de Herreros M et al. Clinical and transcriptomic characterization of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with low PTEN expression. Int J Mol Sci 2025;26(13):6244. Abstract

Hamid AA et al. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Toward an era of adaptive and personalized treatment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023;43:e390166. Abstract

Jamaspishvili T et al. Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2018;15(4):222-34. Abstract

Kisiel F et al. Prognostic significance of PTEN loss in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of Gleason grade and clinical outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2025;17(17):2862. Abstract

Maekawa S et al. Molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer development in the precision medicine era: A comprehensive review. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16(3):523. Abstract

Sweeney C et al. Ipatasertib plus abiraterone and prednisolone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (IPATential150): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021;398(10295):131-42. Abstract