To play this presentation please log in.
Don't have an account?
Sign up for free and get access to 400+ programs, live events, CME/CNE evaluations, bookmarks, watch history, and more.
Faculty
Faculty
Professor Constantine Tam
MBBS, MD
Monash University Melbourne, Australia
Head of Lymphoma Service Alfred Health Professor of Haematology
TARGET AUDIENCE
This activity is intended for medical oncologists, hematology-oncology fellows and other healthcare providers involved in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- Individualize the selection of systemic therapy for patients with newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), considering new research findings, clinical presentation, biomarker profile, coexisting medical conditions and preferences for time-limited or continuous treatment.
- Appraise available Phase III data documenting the comparative efficacy and tolerability of first- and second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, and consider the implications of these findings in clinical decision-making for patients with newly diagnosed CLL.
- Appreciate the safety and efficacy of combined BTK and Bcl-2 inhibition, and review recently presented data with this strategy in CLL.
- Analyze how age, performance status, prior therapeutic exposure and other biological and disease-related factors affect the selection and sequencing of therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL.
- Discuss available clinical research demonstrating the efficacy and safety of noncovalent BTK inhibitors for CLL, and use this information to effectively incorporate these agents into the care of patients with R/R disease.
- Evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for CLL, and identify patients appropriate for treatment with this novel strategy.
- Recall available and emerging data with novel agents and combination strategies currently under investigation in CLL, and appropriately refer eligible patients for clinical trial participation.
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Video Interview: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Video Lecture: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (ABIM) — MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION (MOC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the participant to earn up to 1 (video) and 1 (lecture) Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for each activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Please note, these programs have been specifically designed for the following ABIM specialties: medical oncology and hematology.
PRIVACY POLICY
Personal information and data sharing: Research To Practice aggregates deidentified user data for program-use analysis, program development, activity planning and site improvement. We may provide aggregate and deidentified data to third parties, including commercial supporters. We do not share or sell personally identifiable information to any unaffiliated third parties or commercial supporters. Please see our privacy policy at ResearchToPractice.com/Privacy-Policy for more information.
HOW TO USE THIS CME ACTIVITY
To receive credit for an activity in this series, the participant should review the CME information, listen to or view the MP3s, review the downloadable slide set, complete the post-test with a score of 80% or better and fill out the evaluation. Program location URLs are noted below:
Video Interview: ResearchToPractice.com/OncologyTodayASHCLL2025/Video and evaluation ResearchToPractice.com/OncologyTodayASHCLL2025/Video/CME.
Video Lecture: ResearchToPractice.com/OncologyTodayASHCLL2025/Presentation and evaluation ResearchToPractice.com/OncologyTodayASHCLL2025/Presentation/CME.
CONTENT VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice (RTP) is committed to providing its participants with high-quality, unbiased and state-of-the-art education and adheres to the ACCME’s Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. Any individuals in a position to control the content of an accredited continuing education activity, including faculty, planners, reviewers and others, are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities (commercial interests). All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated prior to the commencement of this activity. In addition, all activity content is reviewed by RTP scientific staff and an external, independent physician reviewer for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies referenced and patient care recommendations.
FACULTY — The following faculty reported relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities:
Professor Constantine Tam, MBBS, MD
Head of Lymphoma Service
Alfred Health
Professor of Haematology
Monash University
Melbourne, Australia
No relevant financial relationships to disclose.
EDITOR — Dr Love is president and CEO of Research To Practice. Research To Practice receives funds in the form of educational grants to develop CME activities from the following companies: Aadi Bioscience, AbbVie Inc, ADC Therapeutics, Agendia Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc, Array BioPharma Inc, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc, Arvinas, Astellas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, BeOne, Biotheranostics Inc, A Hologic Company, Black Diamond Therapeutics Inc, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celcuity, Clovis Oncology, Coherus BioSciences, Corcept Therapeutics Inc, CTI BioPharma, a Sobi Company, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Eisai Inc, Elevation Oncology Inc, Exact Sciences Corporation, Exelixis Inc, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Genmab US Inc, Geron Corporation, Gilead Sciences Inc, GSK, Helsinn Therapeutics (US) Inc, ImmunoGen Inc, Incyte Corporation, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, A Gilead Company, Kura Oncology, Legend Biotech, Lilly, MEI Pharma Inc, Merck, Mersana Therapeutics Inc, Mirati Therapeutics Inc, Mural Oncology Inc, Natera Inc, Novartis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation on behalf of Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novocure Inc, Nuvalent, Nuvation Bio Inc, Pfizer Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Puma Biotechnology Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Revolution Medicines Inc, Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc, R-Pharm US, Sanofi, Seagen Inc, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, SpringWorks Therapeutics Inc, Stemline Therapeutics Inc, Sumitomo Pharma America, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, TerSera Therapeutics LLC, and Tesaro, A GSK Company.
RESEARCH TO PRACTICE CME PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, STAFF AND REVIEWERS — Planners, scientific staff and independent reviewers for Research To Practice have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
These educational activities contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the Food and Drug Administration. Research To Practice does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. The opinions expressed are those of the presenters and are not to be construed as those of the publisher or grantors.
Release date: March 2026
Expiration date: March 2027
After completing the post-test, learners may download and review the answers here in order to identify further areas of study.
Ahn I et al. Updated efficacy and safety results of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) degrader BGB-16673 in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) from the ongoing phase 1 CaDAnCe-101 study. ASH 2025;Abstract 85.
Al-Sawaf O et al. Fixed-duration versus continuous targeted treatment for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from the randomized CLL17 trial. ASH 2025;Abstract 1.
Guieze R et al. Time-limited acalabrutinib monotherapy in frail patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Primary endpoint analysis of the randomized STAIR trial. ASH 2025;Abstract 684.
Hoffman M et al. MRD-guided therapy of sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + obinutuzumab (O) in patients with treatment-naive CLL: Initial results from an ongoing phase 1/1b study, BGB-11417-101. ASH 2025;Abstract 793.
Huang J et al. Superior real-world outcomes of lisocabtagene maraleucel in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. ASH 2025;Abstract 798.
Jurczak W et al. Pirtobrutinib vs bendamustine plus rituximab (BendaR) in patients with CLL/SLL: First results from a randomized phase III study examining a non-covalent BTK inhibitor in untreated patients. ASH 2025;Abstract LBA-3.
Seymour J et al. A post hoc safety analysis of fixed-duration acalabrutinib-venetoclax combinations vs chemoimmunotherapy: Results from the phase 3 AMPLIFY trial. ASH 2025;Abstract 2118.
Shadman M et al. Zanubrutinib + venetoclax for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), including patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation and unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable status: 3-year results from SEQUOIA arm D. ASH 2025;Abstract 5669.
Swaminathan M et al. Addition of obinutuzumab after one year of combined acalabrutinib and venetoclax is safer and effective than early obinutuzumab in a randomized phase II trial for treatment naïve CLL. ASH 2025;Abstract 681.
Tam C et al. Frontline treatment of sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + zanubrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) demonstrates high undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) rates with favorable tolerability: Updated data from BGB-11417-101, an ongoing phase 1/1b study. ASH 2025;Abstract 3891.
Tam C et al. Long-term results of patients receiving zanubrutinib in the phase 3 ALPINE study confirm sustained benefit of zanubrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (R/R CLL/SLL): Up to 6 years of follow-up with the long-term extension (LTE1). ASH 2025;Abstract 2123.
Tam C et al. Sustained efficacy of zanubrutinib (zanu) vs bendamustine + rituximab (BR) in treatment (tx)-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (TN SLL/CLL) and continued favorable survival in nonrandomized patients with del(17p): 6-year follow-up in the phase 3 SEQUOIA study. ASH 2025;Abstract 2129.
Woyach J et al. Pirtobrutinib vs ibrutinib in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL: Results from the first randomized phase III study comparing a non-covalent and covalent BTK inhibitor. ASH 2025;Abstract 683.