Investigators Provide Perspectives on Actual Cases of Metastatic Bladder Cancer — Rapid Case Review: Issue 1

Faculty

TARGET AUDIENCE
This activity is intended for medical oncologists, hematology-oncology fellows and other healthcare providers involved in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

• Review how biological and patient-specific factors (eg, age, performance status, prior treatment, comorbidities and preexisting conditions) influence the selection and sequencing of treatment for metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (mUBC).
• Recognize the incidence of nectin-4 expression in patients with UBC, and appreciate the scientific justification for the development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting this novel biomarker.
• Interrogate published efficacy and safety findings with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in combination with ADC therapy as first-line treatment for mUBC, and consider the current role of this strategy for patients with the disease.
• Recall pivotal clinical trial findings leading to the FDA approval of novel compounds (eg, ADCs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors) with unique mechanisms of action for previously treated locally advanced or mUBC, and identify patients for whom these approaches would be appropriate.
• Appreciate the frequency and severity of therapy-related adverse events commonly encountered by patients receiving guideline-endorsed agents and regimens for mUBC, and enact effective monitoring and management procedures for appropriate individuals.
• Describe the scientific justification for and published research data with novel strategies under investigation in UBC, and effectively prioritize clinical trial opportunities for eligible patients.

ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Video Program: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (ABIM) — MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION (MOC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the participant to earn up to 0.75 (video) Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for each activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

Please note, these programs have been specifically designed for the following ABIM specialty: medical oncology.

AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY (ABS) — CONTINUOUS CERTIFICATION (CC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the learner to earn credit toward the CME and Self-Assessment requirement(s) of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABS credit.

Please note, these programs have been specifically designed for the following ABS practice area: complex general surgical oncology.

PRIVACY POLICY
Personal information and data sharing: Research To Practice aggregates deidentified user data for program-use analysis, program development, activity planning and site improvement. We may provide aggregate and deidentified data to third parties, including commercial supporters. We do not share or sell personally identifiable information to any unaffiliated third parties or commercial supporters. Please see our privacy policy at ResearchToPractice.com/Privacy-Policy for more information.

HOW TO USE THIS CME ACTIVITY
To receive credit for an activity in this series, the participant should review the CME information, listen to or view the MP3s, complete the post-test with a score of 80% or better and fill out the evaluation. Program location URLs are noted below:

Video Interview: ResearchToPractice.com/RapidCaseReview2026/Bladder/1/Video and evaluation ResearchToPractice.com/RapidCaseReview2026/Bladder/1/Video/CME.

CONTENT VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice (RTP) is committed to providing its participants with high-quality, unbiased and state-of-the-art education and adheres to the ACCME’s Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. Any individuals in a position to control the content of an accredited continuing education activity, including faculty, planners, reviewers and others, are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities (commercial interests). All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated prior to the commencement of these activities. In addition, all activity content is reviewed by RTP scientific staff and an external, independent physician reviewer for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies referenced and patient care recommendations.

FACULTY

Fern Anari, MD
Assistant Professor of Genitourinary Medical Oncology
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Catherine Fahey, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, Division of Oncology
Department of Medicine
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina

The following faculty reported relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities:

Matthew D Galsky, MD
Lillian and Howard Stratton Professor of Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Co-Leader, Bladder Cancer Center of Excellence
Associate Director, Translational Research
The Tisch Cancer Institute
New York, New York

Consulting Agreements: AbbVie Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, EMD Serono Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc, Merck, Pfizer Inc, Seagen Inc.

EDITOR — Dr Love is president and CEO of Research To Practice. Research To Practice receives funds in the form of educational grants to develop CME activities from the following companies: Aadi Bioscience, AbbVie Inc, ADC Therapeutics, Agendia Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc, Array BioPharma Inc, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc, Arvinas, Astellas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, BeOne, Biotheranostics Inc, A Hologic Company, Black Diamond Therapeutics Inc, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celcuity, Clovis Oncology, Coherus BioSciences, Corcept Therapeutics Inc, CTI BioPharma, a Sobi Company, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Eisai Inc, Elevation Oncology Inc, Exact Sciences Corporation, Exelixis Inc, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Genmab US Inc, Geron Corporation, Gilead Sciences Inc, GSK, Helsinn Therapeutics (US) Inc, ImmunoGen Inc, Incyte Corporation, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, A Gilead Company, Kura Oncology, Legend Biotech, Lilly, MEI Pharma Inc, Merck, Mersana Therapeutics Inc, Mirati Therapeutics Inc, Mural Oncology Inc, Natera Inc, Novartis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation on behalf of Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novocure Inc, Nuvalent, Nuvation Bio Inc, Pfizer Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Puma Biotechnology Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc, R-Pharm US, Sanofi, Seagen Inc, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, SpringWorks Therapeutics Inc, Stemline Therapeutics Inc, Sumitomo Pharma America, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, TerSera Therapeutics LLC, and Tesaro, A GSK Company.

RESEARCH TO PRACTICE CME PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, STAFF AND REVIEWERS — Planners, scientific staff and independent reviewers for Research To Practice have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

These educational activities contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the Food and Drug Administration. Research To Practice does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. The opinions expressed are those of the presenters and are not to be construed as those of the publisher or grantor.

These activities are supported by an educational grant from Pfizer Inc and Astellas.

Release date: January 2026
Expiration date: January 2027

After completing the post-test, learners may download and review the answers here in order to identify further areas of study.

Aggarwal R et al. Final results from PRESTO: A phase III open-label study of combined androgen blockade in patients (pts) with high-risk biochemically relapsed prostate cancer (BRPC) (AFT-19). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA88.

Azad AA et al. First interim efficacy analysis of the phase I/II PETRANHA trial of saruparib + androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). ESMO 2025;Abstract 2384MO.

Carles Galceran J et al. Time to response with talazoparib (TALA) + enzalutamide (ENZA) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in TALAPRO-2. ESMO 2025;Abstract 2428P.

Cho KS et al. Lymphovascular invasion of transurethral resection specimens as predictor as progression and metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed T1 bladder urothelial cancer. J Urol 2009;182(6):2625-30. Abstract

De Santis M et al. Durvalumab (D) in combination with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for BCG-naïve, high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): Final analysis of the phase III, open-label, randomised POTOMAC trial. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA108.

Fizazi K et al. A phase III study of capivasertib (capi) + abiraterone (abi) vs placebo (pbo) + abi in patients (pts) with PTEN deficient de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): CAPItello-281. ESMO 2025;Abstract 2383O.

Fizazi K et al. Capivasertib plus abiraterone in PTEN-deficient metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: CAPItello-281 phase III study. Ann Oncol 2025;[Online ahead of print]. Abstract

Galsky MD et al. Adjuvant nivolumab vs placebo for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: 5-year efficacy and ctDNA results from CheckMate 274. ESMO 2025;Abstract 3068O.

Makker V et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for pretreated patients (pts) with HER2-expressing solid tumors: DESTINY-PanTumor02 (DP-02) part 1 final analysis. ESMO 2025;Abstract 957P.

Necchi A et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical system (TAR-200) + cetrelimab (CET) or CET alone in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): SunRISe-4 (SR-4) primary analysis and biomarker results. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA112.

Nguyen PL et al. Randomised phase III trial of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiation therapy with or without enzalutamide for high risk, clinically localised prostate cancer: ENZARAD (ANZUP 1303). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA86.

Powles TB et al. IMvigor011: A phase III trial of circulating tumour (ct)DNA-guided adjuvant atezolizumab vs placebo in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA8.

Powles TB et al. A randomised phase III trial of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and adjuvant durvalumab in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NIAGARA). ESMO 2024;Abstract LBA5.

Powles T et al. Perioperative durvalumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2024;391(19):1773-86. Abstract

Rha SY et al. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + rilvegostomig (rilve) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (a/mUC): Results from the phase II TROPION-PanTumor03 study. ESMO 2025;Abstract 3072MO.

Sheng X et al. Disitamab vedotin (DV) plus toripalimab (T) versus chemotherapy (C) in first-line (1L) locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) with HER2-expression. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA7.

Shore ND et al. EMBARK: Overall survival with enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA87.

Tagawa ST et al. Phase III trial of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 combined with ADT + ARPI in patients with PSMA-positive metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PSMAddition). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA6.

van der Heijden MS et al. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from the NIAGARA trial of perioperative durvalumab (D) plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). ESMO 2025;Abstract 3069MO.

Vulsteke C et al. Perioperative (periop) enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in participants (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are cisplatin-ineligible: The phase III KEYNOTE-905 study. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA2.