To play this presentation please log in.
Don't have an account?
Sign up for free and get access to 400+ programs, live events, CME/CNE evaluations, bookmarks, watch history, and more.
Faculty
Faculty
Lisa A Carey
MD, ScM, FASCO
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
L Richardson and Marilyn Jacobs Preyer Distinguished Professor for Breast Cancer Research
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Deputy Director for Clinical Sciences
UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Chief Clinical Research Officer, Clinical Research Partners
Faculty
Rita Nanda
MD
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Director, Breast Oncology, Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology
TARGET AUDIENCE
This program is intended for medical oncologists, breast surgeons, radiation oncologists and other healthcare professionals involved in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- Appreciate the pathophysiology, incidence and severity of class-effect and agent-specific toxicities associated with FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
- Understand the frequency and severity of gastrointestinal side effects of ADCs, and educate patients about to commence treatment with these agents regarding the potential development of these adverse events, how to prevent them and what to do if they occur.
- Implement a plan of care to monitor for, recognize and manage interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis in patients receiving treatment with ADCs.
- Recall strategies to identify, manage and mitigate other toxicities associated with ADCs commonly used in the care of patients with mBC, such as fatigue, neutropenia, stomatitis and ocular toxicities, and use this information to appropriately intervene when side effects are suspected or diagnosed.
- Appraise the role of multidisciplinary specialists in the diagnosis and management of toxicities associated with ADCs commonly used in the care of patients with mBC, and effectively collaborate to offer best-practice care.
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Video Program: Research To Practice designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (ABIM) — MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION (MOC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the participant to earn up to 1.25 (video) Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for each activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Please note, these programs have been specifically designed for the following ABIM specialty: medical oncology.
AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY (ABS) — CONTINUOUS CERTIFICATION (CC)
Successful completion of these CME activities, which includes participation in the evaluation components and post-tests, enables the learner to earn credit toward the CME and Self-Assessment requirement(s) of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABS credit.
Please note, these programs have been specifically designed for the following ABS practice area: complex general surgical oncology..
PRIVACY POLICY
Personal information and data sharing: Research To Practice aggregates deidentified user data for program-use analysis, program development, activity planning and site improvement. We may provide aggregate and deidentified data to third parties, including commercial supporters. We do not share or sell personally identifiable information to any unaffiliated third parties or commercial supporters. Please see our privacy policy at ResearchToPractice.com/Privacy-Policy for more information.
HOW TO USE THIS CME ACTIVITY
Video Program: This CME activity consists of a video component. To receive credit, the participant should review the CME information, watch the video, complete the post-test with a score of 80% or better and fill out the evaluation located at ResearchToPractice.com/PP2025/ADCToxmBC/Video/CME.
CONTENT VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice (RTP) is committed to providing its participants with high-quality, unbiased and state-of-the-art education and adheres to the ACCME’s Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. Any individuals in a position to control the content of an accredited continuing education activity, including faculty, planners, reviewers and others, are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities (commercial interests). All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated prior to the commencement of this activity. In addition, all activity content is reviewed by RTP scientific staff and an external, independent physician reviewer for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies referenced and patient care recommendations.
FACULTY — The following faculty reported relevant financial relationships with ineligible entities:
Lisa A Carey, MD, ScM, FASCO
L Richardson and Marilyn Jacobs Preyer Distinguished Professor for Breast Cancer Research
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Deputy Director for Clinical Sciences
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chief Clinical Research Officer, Clinical Research Partners
UNC Health
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
No relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Rita Nanda, MD
Director, Breast Oncology
Associate Professor of Medicine
Section of Hematology/Oncology
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Advisory Committees: Arvinas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Exact Sciences Corporation, GE Healthcare, Gilead Sciences Inc, Guardant Health, Lilly, Mabwell Therapeutics Inc, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Stemline Therapeutics Inc, Summit Therapeutics; Contracted Research: Arvinas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corcept Therapeutics Inc, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Gilead Sciences Inc, GSK, Merck, Novartis, OBI Pharma Inc, Pfizer Inc, Relay Therapeutics, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Taiho Oncology Inc.
MODERATOR — Dr Love is president and CEO of Research To Practice. Research To Practice receives funds in the form of educational grants to develop CME activities from the following companies: Aadi Bioscience, AbbVie Inc, ADC Therapeutics, Agendia Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc, Array BioPharma Inc, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc, Arvinas, Astellas, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, BeOne, Biotheranostics Inc, A Hologic Company, Black Diamond Therapeutics Inc, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celcuity, Clovis Oncology, Coherus BioSciences, Corcept Therapeutics Inc, CTI BioPharma, a Sobi Company, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Eisai Inc, Elevation Oncology Inc, Exact Sciences Corporation, Exelixis Inc, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Genmab US Inc, Geron Corporation, Gilead Sciences Inc, GSK, Helsinn Therapeutics (US) Inc, ImmunoGen Inc, Incyte Corporation, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, A Gilead Company, Kura Oncology, Legend Biotech, Lilly, MEI Pharma Inc, Merck, Mersana Therapeutics Inc, Mirati Therapeutics Inc, Mural Oncology Inc, Natera Inc, Novartis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation on behalf of Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novocure Inc, Nuvalent, Nuvation Bio Inc, Pfizer Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Puma Biotechnology Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Revolution Medicines Inc, Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc, R-Pharm US, Sanofi, Seagen Inc, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, SpringWorks Therapeutics Inc, Stemline Therapeutics Inc, Sumitomo Pharma America, Summit Therapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, TerSera Therapeutics LLC, and Tesaro, A GSK Company.
RESEARCH TO PRACTICE CME PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, STAFF AND REVIEWERS — Planners, scientific staff and independent reviewers for Research To Practice have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
These educational activities contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the Food and Drug Administration. Research To Practice does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. The opinions expressed are those of the presenters and are not to be construed as those of the publisher or grantor.
These activities are supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences Inc.
Release date: December 2025
Expiration date: December 2026
After completing the post-test, learners may download and review the answers here in order to identify further areas of study.
Cortés JC et al. Primary results from ASCENT-03: A randomized phase III study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are unable to receive PD-(L)1 inhibitors (PD-[L]1i). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA20.
de Azambuja E et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with sacituzumab govitecan (SG) + pembrolizumab (pembro) vs chemotherapy (chemo) + pembro in patients (pts) with ppreviously untreated PD-L1+ meatstatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA22.
Dent RA et al. First-line (1L) datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) for whom immunotherapy was not an option: Primary results from the randomised, phase III TROPION-Breast02 trial. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA21.
Fan Y et al. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) vs investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in previously treated locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC): Results from the randomized, multicenter phase 3 OptiTROP-Breast02 study. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA23.
Geyer CE et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) primary breast cancer (BC) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy (tx): Interim analysis of DESTINY-Breast05. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA1.
Hamilton E et al. Her2climb-05: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of tucatinib versus placebo in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab as maintenance therapy for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025;Abstract GS1-01.
Harbeck N et al. DESTINY-Breast11: Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan alone (T-DXd) or followed by paclitaxel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (T-DXd-THP) vs SOC for high-risk HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC). ESMO 2025;Abstract 2910O.
Harbeck N et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan versus standard of care chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in HER2+ early breast cancer: WSG-ADAPT-HER2-IV. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025;Abstract GS1-02.
Hurvitz S et al. Tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine for patients with previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: Primary analysis of the randomized phase III trial HER2CLIMB-02. Ann Oncol 2025;[Online ahead of print]. Abstract
Jhaveri K et al. Sacituzumab govitecan vs chemotherapy as first therapy after endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2−(IHC 0, 1+, 2+/ISH−) metastatic breast cancer: Primary results from ASCENT-07. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025;Abstract GS1-10.
Loibl S et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) + pertuzumab vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) for patients with HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Additional analyses of DESTINY-Breast09 in keynote subgroups of interest. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA18.
Pérez García JM et al. Prevention of sacituzumab govitecan-related neutropenia and diarrhea in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (PRIMED): An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. ASCO 2024;Abstract 1101.
Tolaney SM et al. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) + pembrolizumab (pembro) vs chemotherapy (chemo) + pembro in previously untreated PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Primary results from the randomized phase 3 ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study. ASCO 2025;Abstract LBA109.
Tolaney SM et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) + pertuzumab (P) vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) for first-line (1L) treatment of patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC): Interim results from DESTINYBreast09. ASCO 2025;Abstract LBA1008.